I was watching her face intently as she asked questions. I listened as he offered responses in a kind and measured fashion.
She was expressing emotions, her feelings revealed both in words and the tilt of her head downward, and the sadness in her eyes. He is her son; they share history – and a good one, best I can tell. He was dealing with emotions of his own – or perhaps deflecting them – in this difficult process of moving an older parent into a retirement community.
Perhaps the fact that I am an outsider is the reason I witnessed a different conversation. But more likely – I heard her as a woman, in a way that he, as a man, did not.
To me, regardless of age and scenario, it was an example of he said, she said – communication on both sides, missing the mark.
What she said is not what he heard. What he said is not what she understood.
Was I correct in my reaction to her words and non-verbal communication? That she was speaking from feelings, from full awareness of her stage in life, from fear of abandonment, while he was responding to logistics from a place of actions, from the relative vitality of midlife, and perhaps from a small measure of emotional denial?
Men and Women, Communication Styles
So how is it that we communicate at cross purposes? What kind of work does it take to bridge that gap – especially when reassurance is needed, when emotions run high, and when the stakes – psychologically – may be even higher?
My sons are teenagers, and we communicate differently; we hear and interpret differently, though one is more attuned to reading my expressions than his brother. And there are expressions to be read – the signs inherent in non-verbal communication: the gesture, the glance, the stance, the btilt of the head, the tone of voice.
Research bears this out: women express more facially – through movement of lips, cheeks, eyebrows.
So is it nature or nurture that when it comes to emotions we speak and listen so differently? Biology? Chemistry? How much is cultural? How much can be reshaped? Certainly, we encounter both men and women who are empathetic, and learn to communicate in ways that put that empathy to use.
Perhaps it’s in puberty that the shift occurs, though it may be more gradual or happen sooner. But it happens – and girls and women generally zero in on the meaning behind language – what isn’t said as well as what is – reading context, expressions, and the manner in which the message is delivered.
Is this tied to the stereotypical notion that women want to talk, and men want to act – or more specifically, to fix things, when sometimes the “fix” is really as simple as discussing the matter? Getting feelings out into the open?
Is it a fact that women identify emotions more easily, and thus can articulate them, whereas men do not?
According to a 2010 article in Psychology Today on men, women, emotions, and communication:
Most men have a hard time communicating anything that remotely resembles an emotion. Why? Because emotions are scary to men, who think much more than they feel, and much of the time, many men don’t even know what or how they are feeling… It is interesting to note that women think and feel at the same time, while men can only think or feel.
Women are thought to be better at multitasking than men, but apparently women are also more capable of simultaneously thinking and feeling.
To be frank, processing rationally and emotionally at the same time seems routine, to me. I’m guessing it does to most women. And it would never have entered my mind that men (generally) don’t process in this fashion.
Of course it’s more complex than this (biology, chemistry, nature, nurture – not to mention learning to control our emotional responses in order to achieve a particular goal); still, would this explain the differences in hearing and interpreting? Are men socialized to block receipt of emotional messages?
While the article I reference deals largely in the context of relationships and conversational styles - as in the proverbial “We need to talk” that requires a man to switch gears (“from head to heart”) – it also addresses the fact that apparently women speak more quickly and have more words at their disposal. Surely this is socialization – isn’t it? And particular to Western cultures?
A variety of other differences in how men and women communicate are mentioned, but the issue of how we listen is not. Yet if men are more averse to emotional discussions, might this mean that women ought to cut them a break, slow down, and take more time in trying to bridge the communication gap – whatever its origin?
Listening Skills Can Be Learned
Following the exchange overheard between mother and son, I put my little toe into a private conversation of my own. I suggested to the gentleman that his mother wasn’t hearing what he was saying in the way he intended it. I also suggested that her body language and words were speaking from an emotional zone that is scared about being left alone, though that certainly isn’t his intention.
I saw what I believe to be a request for reassurance – that ongoing communication and visits will continue as usual, that this move to a beautiful, independent living community truly is about providing amenities and security, and is in no way an attempt to send her away or forget about her. And this is where actions will help – the continuation of his usual rhythm of calls and visits.
The situation is challenging, and there is no “cure” to aging except the obvious. As for aging gracefully, this woman certainly has. But she is experiencing a major transition, and is understandably afraid. That none of us who are at another stage in life can fully appreciate what she’s feeling is, of course, inevitable.
What isn’t inevitable is learning to listen with the heart, to read the look in an eye, and perhaps – for men and women to translate for each other. Men, when women need the assist, and likewise the other way around, when the situation calls for it.